Skip to main content

Compare

Botscope vs Anubis

Botscope and Anubis: what to compare when you look at both, the questions worth putting to either vendor, and where Botscope is the weaker choice.

Free plan, no card. 100,000 events a month with every feature on.

botscope.io · last 7d

This site, classified by this product. Nothing here is a mock-up.

live
requests
4,250
human
80%
AI agents
0%
stopped
0%
verdict stream
  1. signals
    • threat_feed: datacenter — fail (listed on a subscribed feed)
    • anomaly_score: 0.25 — pass (combined disagreement across the collected signals)
  2. signals
    • threat_feed: datacenter — fail (listed on a subscribed feed)
    • anomaly_score: 0.25 — pass (combined disagreement across the collected signals)
  3. signals
    • threat_feed: datacenter — fail (listed on a subscribed feed)
    • anomaly_score: 0.25 — pass (combined disagreement across the collected signals)

botscope.io's own traffic only — never a customer's. No addresses, no query strings, and a path is shown only when it is already a public page.

In short

  • Anubis is open-source software that puts a proof-of-work challenge in front of a site to deter automated crawling.
  • Botscope reads every request at your origin and says what each automated client is, with the evidence attached to the decision.
  • These are different purchases more often than they are competing ones: if the goal is to make mass crawling expensive and you are happy to run it yourself, a proof-of-work gate does that directly.
  • Anything either vendor tells you about the other is worth checking against their own documentation before you decide.

Updated 16 September 2026

01 · what this page is, and what it avoids

What this page is, and what it avoids

This page makes no claim about what Anubis does or does not do. Their capabilities change, their documentation is public, and a claim written here would be out of date before it was useful — and wrong in the direction that suits us, which is how these pages usually go.

What follows is the set of questions worth asking of either product, and a plain statement of where Botscope is the weaker choice.

02 · what to look for in either

What to look for in either

Where does it sit? A self-hosted gate sits in your own request path, under your control, with no third party involved and no data leaving your infrastructure. Botscope classifies at your origin, after the edge has done whatever it does, which is why it sees what actually arrived rather than what was let through.

Can one decision be explained? Ask to see a single verdict with the signals behind it. If the answer is a score, the follow-up is what you tell a customer who was stopped by it.

What does it cost to find out? Whether you can answer either question above without a sales process is itself an answer.

Who is it for? if the goal is to make mass crawling expensive and you are happy to run it yourself, a proof-of-work gate does that directly.

03 · where anubis is the better choice

Where Anubis is the better choice

Free, and yours

No account, no vendor, no per-event pricing, and nothing about your traffic leaves your servers. For a project that values that above everything, no commercial product answers it.

Blunt in a way that works

A challenge in front of everything does not need to identify an agent to slow it down, which makes it effective against crawlers nobody has catalogued yet.

04 · where botscope is the one to pick

Where Botscope is the one to pick

When you need to know who was stopped rather than only that fewer of them got through, and when a challenge in front of every visitor is not acceptable. Botscope names the agent, records why, and lets verified crawlers past without a gate.

Questions

Can I run both?

Usually yes, and often that is the right answer. Botscope classifies at the origin and does not sit in the request path, so it does not conflict with something running in front of it. What it adds is the record of what got through.

Why does this page not list their weaknesses?

Because we would be choosing which weaknesses to list, and you would have no way to check. The questions above are ones you can put to both vendors and compare the answers yourself.

How do I try Botscope without committing to anything?

The free tier is 100,000 events a month with no card and every feature on, and new sites start in observation mode — everything classified and recorded, nothing blocked. You can answer "what is actually reaching me" before deciding whether to act on it.

What does Botscope not do at all?

It is not a WAF, it is not DDoS protection, and it shows no CAPTCHA. It classifies requests and records why; it does not absorb volume and it does not replace whatever you run at the edge.

See which of these reach your site

Free plan, no card: 100,000 events a month with every feature on. Nothing is blocked until you turn enforcement on.

Related